Hire Offshore SAP Solution Architects in Australia for Large-Scale ERP Programs

When an SAP program goes wrong, the finger usually points at the same place: nobody owned the architecture. Configuration decisions were made in isolation. Integration points were resolved by whoever was closest to the problem. The system landscape grew in directions no one had designed. And by the time the issues surface — usually somewhere between go-live and the six-month mark — the cost of unwinding them is several times what good architecture would have cost upfront.

SAP Solution Architects are the most strategically critical hire on any large ERP program. They are also the most expensive, the hardest to find in Australia, and the role most commonly filled too late or left vacant entirely. Offshore SAP Solution Architects are changing that equation for Australian enterprises and MSPs running complex ERP programs — and this guide covers exactly how.

What a SAP Solution Architect Actually Does

The SAP Solution Architect sits at the top of the technical hierarchy on an ERP program. They are not writing configuration or developing ABAP — they are defining how the entire solution hangs together, making the high-consequence decisions that every other role on the project depends on.

SAP architects have specialised knowledge of SAP technology and are therefore able to create and execute an architectural blueprint that outlines solutions to achieve complex business objectives. They operate at the intersection of business requirements, technical capability, and long-term enterprise strategy — which is what makes them genuinely difficult to find and genuinely expensive when you do.

Core Responsibilities of a SAP Solution Architect

• Designing the end-to-end SAP solution architecture — system landscape, module scope, integration topology, and deployment model
• Leading fit-gap analysis and translating business requirements into a coherent architectural design
• Defining the integration architecture — how SAP connects to third-party systems via APIs, IDocs, BTP, and middleware
• Guiding the approach to SAP S/4HANA migration — brownfield versus greenfield decisions, custom code impact, and data migration strategy
• Producing and owning the solution design document, functional specifications framework, and technical standards
• Providing architectural governance across the delivery team — reviewing design decisions, resolving conflicts between workstreams, and managing technical risk
• Engaging client business stakeholders and translating strategic objectives into SAP design decisions
• Advising on SAP module selection, licensing implications, and cloud versus on-premise deployment trade-offs
• Mentoring functional consultants and ABAP developers on architecture direction and design standards
• Supporting project governance — attending steering committee meetings, contributing to risk registers, and advising on scope change impacts

The breadth of this role is what makes a SAP Solution Architect fundamentally different from a senior functional consultant or a technical lead. They span the entire solution — not a single module or workstream.

The Different Types of SAP Architect Roles

Not every architect role carries the same scope. Understanding the distinctions helps when defining what your program actually needs.

a. SAP Solution Architect

The most common engagement title for large implementations. The SAP Solution Architect owns the end-to-end solution design for a specific program — covering module scope, integration design, technical standards, and architectural governance across all workstreams. This is the role most Australian MSPs and enterprises need for a mid-to-large SAP program.

b. SAP Enterprise Architect

A broader, more strategic role typically found in large enterprises running SAP as a core platform. The Enterprise Architect is responsible for the long-term SAP landscape — roadmap planning, technology investment decisions, and aligning SAP evolution with enterprise IT strategy. They engage with C-level stakeholders and set direction across multiple programs simultaneously.

c. SAP Technical Architect

Focused on the technical layer — infrastructure, SAP Basis architecture, security design, performance, and system landscape topology. A Technical Architect works closely with the Solution Architect but focuses specifically on the technical platform rather than the functional solution design.

d. SAP Integration Architect

A specialist role focused entirely on the integration layer — defining integration patterns, middleware selection (SAP BTP, CPI, PI/PO), API standards, and the design of interfaces between SAP and the surrounding application landscape. In large hybrid environments with many connected systems, this can be a dedicated role alongside the broader Solution Architect.

Why SAP Solution Architects Are So Scarce in Australia

Australia has a well-documented shortage of senior SAP talent across every dimension. At the Solution Architect level, the scarcity is acute. There are simply not enough experienced SAP architects in the Australian market to meet the current demand — driven largely by the S/4HANA migration wave, public sector digitisation programs, and the continued investment of major Australian enterprises in SAP as a core ERP platform.

What the Local Market Looks Like

According to Glassdoor data from July 2025, the average salary for a SAP Solution Architect in Australia is $173,500 per year, with top earners reporting up to $250,700 at the 90th percentile. SAP Solution Architect contractor roles are actively advertising at $1,150–$1,232 per day for government engagements — and those are the disclosed rates, not the negotiated ones.

Add superannuation (rising to 12% from July 2025), recruitment agency fees averaging 15–20% of first-year salary, potential relocation costs, and the time cost of a 12–20 week local hiring process, and a single senior SAP Solution Architect hire can represent an all-in first-year cost of AUD $280,000–$380,000 for a large enterprise.

The supply problem is compounded by the fact that experienced SAP architects tend to be engaged. They are either in long-running enterprise programs, locked into large consulting firm benches at premium rates, or working as independent contractors who price their scarcity accordingly. For MSPs and mid-sized enterprises, competing for that talent against Deloitte, Accenture, and Capgemini is a losing proposition on price alone.

The S/4HANA Demand Spike

The pressure is structural, not cyclical. With SAP's end-of-mainstream-maintenance deadline for SAP ECC set at December 2027, Australian enterprises face no choice but to initiate migration programs now. PwC noted in 2024 that it had seen "very few Australian and New Zealand customers migrate so far" to S/4HANA — and warned that "three years is not a long time to successfully execute a migration." That pipeline of deferred programs is flooding an already constrained architect market with concurrent demand.

Eursap's Director has characterised the global shortage in similar terms: "S/4HANA migration programmes are no longer theoretical roadmaps. They are live projects with fixed deadlines. That urgency is exposing deep capability gaps across both functional and technical SAP roles." Australia's situation mirrors this — and the architect talent pool here is smaller than in any comparable Western market. For more context on the migration pressures Australian businesses face, see the guide on hiring offshore S/4HANA migration consultants for Australian MSPs.
‍

‍Why Hire Offshore Solution Architects in Australia for Large-Scale ERP Programmes

Large-scale ERP programmes—whether SAP S/4HANA transformations, multi-country rollouts, or platform consolidations—are fundamentally architecture-led initiatives.

The success of these programmes depends on having the right Solution Architects who can:

• Define system design across modules and integrations
• Align business processes with technical capabilities
• Ensure scalability, security, and performance from day one

However, in the Australian market, hiring experienced Solution Architects locally has become increasingly difficult and expensive. This is why many enterprises and MSPs are turning to offshore Solution Architects as a strategic capability, not just a cost-saving measure.

Key Challenges of Hiring Solution Architects Locally in Australia

1. Severe Talent Shortage at the Senior Level

Solution Architects with 10–15+ years of ERP experience are limited in supply.

• Most are already engaged in long-term transformation programmes
• Strong candidates are rarely available on short notice
• Hiring cycles can extend to 8–12 weeks or more

This creates delays in programme initiation and impacts delivery timelines.

2. High Cost of Senior Architecture Talent

Local Solution Architects command premium compensation:

• Permanent roles: AUD $180,000–$250,000+
• Contract roles: $1,200–$1,800/day

For large programmes requiring multiple architects (enterprise, integration, data), this significantly increases programme cost.

3. Over-Reliance on Contractors

Many organisations rely on contract architects, which introduces:

• Limited continuity across programme phases
• Knowledge loss between design and delivery
• Higher long-term cost due to daily rates

4. Difficulty Scaling Architecture Capability

ERP programmes often require:

• Multiple architects across workstreams
• Specialisation (e.g. integration, data, security, functional domains)

Scaling this capability locally is both slow and cost-prohibitive.

Why Australian Organisations Are Hiring Offshore Solution Architects

Offshore hiring addresses both capacity and capability constraints.

1. Access to a Deeper, Global Talent Pool

Offshore markets provide access to:

• Architects with experience across multiple global ERP programmes
• Specialists in SAP, Oracle, Dynamics, and hybrid architectures
• Exposure to complex, large-scale implementations

This expands the available talent pool significantly beyond local constraints.

2. Cost Efficiency Without Compromising Expertise

Offshore Solution Architects typically cost:

• 50–70% less than local equivalents

This allows organisations to:

• Allocate budget across multiple architecture roles
• Invest more in design quality upfront
• Reduce reliance on expensive contractors

3. Faster Hiring and Programme Mobilisation

Offshore hiring enables:

• Shortlisting within days
• Hiring within 2–4 weeks

This accelerates:

• Programme kick-off
• Design phases
• Resource alignment across workstreams

4. Ability to Build Multi-Layered Architecture Teams

Instead of relying on a single architect, organisations can build:

• Enterprise Architect (onshore)
• Solution Architects (offshore)
• Domain Architects (integration, data, security)

This creates a structured architecture function, rather than a single point of dependency.

Key Benefits of Hiring Offshore Solution Architects

1. Improved Programme Design Quality

With access to experienced architects and broader coverage:

• Better system design decisions
• Reduced rework during build phases
• Stronger alignment between business and technology

2. Reduced Delivery Risk

Well-defined architecture reduces:

• Integration failures
• Data inconsistencies
• Performance bottlenecks

This directly impacts:

• Go-live success rates
• Stabilisation timelines

3. Greater Cost Control Across the Programme

Offshore architects enable:

• Lower fixed costs
• Reduced contractor dependency
• Better budget predictability

This is particularly important for multi-year ERP programmes.

4. Scalability Across Workstreams

Offshore models allow organisations to:

• Add architects for specific phases (e.g. migration, integration)
• Scale down post-design
• Support multiple parallel streams

5. Continuity Across Programme Lifecycle

Dedicated offshore architects:

• Stay across design, build, and deployment
• Retain knowledge of system architecture
• Reduce dependency on external contractors

6. Extended Delivery Coverage (Time Zone Advantage)

With offshore teams:

• Design documentation and reviews can continue outside local hours
• Faster turnaround on architecture decisions
• Improved programme velocity

‍

What Offshore SAP Solution Architects Cost

The cost comparison between onshore and offshore SAP Solution Architects is one of the most compelling in the SAP talent market. The table below shows indicative all-in annual costs for dedicated full-time offshore hires through a structured staffing model — not project-based freelancers, but practitioners working exclusively for your organisation.

Australian figures include base salary, superannuation at 11.5–12%, payroll tax, workers' compensation, leave entitlements, and amortised recruitment costs. The typical saving runs between 55–70% compared to equivalent local hires.

For a large SAP program running an architect in a dedicated capacity for 18–24 months, the difference between onshore and offshore can exceed AUD $300,000 — a saving that either reduces total program cost or funds additional delivery capability elsewhere in the team.

Where Offshore SAP Solution Architects Add the Most Value

The instinct for many Australian enterprises is to keep architecture onshore and offshore the implementation work. That is a reasonable starting point — but it misses the scenarios where an offshore architect creates the most leverage.

a. Pre-Program Architecture and Design

Before a single functional consultant starts configuring, the program needs an architecture. Solution design documentation, integration blueprints, system landscape design, and the decisions that will govern every downstream workstream are concentrated, high-skill work that can be delivered remotely to an Australian program team. An offshore SAP Solution Architect engaged in the design phase produces the artefacts that make the rest of the program coherent — at a fraction of the cost of an onshore equivalent.

b. Ongoing Architectural Governance

Large SAP programs generate hundreds of design decisions across multiple parallel workstreams. An offshore architect in a governance role — reviewing functional specifications, attending design authority sessions, and managing the solution design document — provides continuous quality control across a program without the cost of a senior onshore resource in a full-time capacity. This is one of the highest-return applications of the model.

c. S/4HANA Migration Planning

The migration from SAP ECC to S/4HANA requires architectural thinking at every stage: assessing the custom code footprint, deciding which simplifications to adopt, designing the data migration approach, and defining the target landscape. This planning work is precisely defined and produces documented outputs — migration readiness assessments, custom code impact analyses, brownfield versus greenfield evaluations — that are well suited to an offshore architect who can deliver them to an Australian business decision-making process. For further reading on the migration planning function, see the step-by-step guide to offshore S/4HANA migration consulting.

d. AMS Architecture Support

MSPs with ongoing application management service contracts need architectural input on complex change requests without the cost of an onshore architect sitting idle between incidents. An offshore SAP Solution Architect providing part-time architectural governance across multiple AMS clients is a cost structure that makes commercial sense where a full-time onshore hire does not.

How to Vet an Offshore SAP Solution Architect: A Practical Framework

Given the stakes, vetting an offshore SAP Solution Architect requires a more rigorous process than most hiring managers apply. The following framework targets the specific capabilities that separate genuine architects from functional consultants who have adopted the title.

i. Program Ownership Probe

Ask the candidate to describe a large SAP program they architected — specifically: what was the scope, who were the stakeholders, what were the hardest architecture decisions they made, and what would they do differently. You are listening for evidence of genuine decision-making authority, comfort with ambiguity, and self-reflection about architectural trade-offs. Candidates who describe implementation work dressed up as architecture will not hold up to this level of questioning.

ii. Architecture Document Review

Ask candidates to provide a sanitised sample of architecture documentation they have personally produced — a system landscape diagram, an integration architecture document, or a solution design document overview. The quality, structure, and depth of what they produce tells you more about their architectural capability than any verbal answer. Real architects produce real artefacts.

iii. Integration Architecture Depth

Ask specifically how they would design the integration between SAP and a hypothetical third-party system — for example, connecting SAP S/4HANA Finance to a Salesforce CRM. Walk through the approach, the technology choices, the data mapping considerations, and the error handling strategy. A genuine SAP Integration Architect will navigate this fluently. A functional consultant will struggle immediately.

iv. S/4HANA Migration Approach

Ask them to walk through how they would approach an S/4HANA migration readiness assessment for a client on SAP ECC with significant custom code. What steps would they take? What outputs would they produce? How would they present findings to a non-technical steering committee? The quality of their structured thinking on this question is one of the best proxies for their architectural maturity.

v. Australian Business Context Scenario

Present a scenario relevant to the Australian context — for example, advising a client on the implications of the 2027 ECC support deadline for their specific landscape, or designing the payroll integration for an Australian business with Modern Award obligations. You are testing contextual awareness and the ability to think practically about Australian business requirements within an SAP architecture frame.

Key Takeaway

SAP Solution Architects are the rarest and most consequential hire on any large ERP program. In Australia, they are both expensive and scarce — which means most enterprises and MSPs are either running programs without adequate architecture or paying a premium that compresses margin and inflates program cost.

Offshore SAP Solution Architects, hired through a structured dedicated model and properly integrated into your delivery team, change both sides of that equation. The architecture capability is genuine. The cost is viable. And the institutional knowledge an offshore architect builds as a long-term practice resource is something no contractor engagement can replicate.

The enterprises and MSPs building offshore SAP architecture capability now are positioning themselves to deliver the S/4HANA migration wave that the Australian market is entering — and to do it at a cost base that makes complex programs commercially sustainable. With the 2027 ECC support deadline creating a structural demand surge that the local talent market cannot absorb, the window for establishing this capability before the competition intensifies is closing.

If you are ready to build offshore SAP architecture capability for your enterprise or MSP, Remote Office provides a structured, scalable model built specifically for the Australian market.

‍Talk to our team about hiring offshore SAP Solution Architects.

‍

Why This Matters Even More for Australian MSPs

For MSPs delivering ERP services, offshore Solution Architects are not just beneficial—they are often essential.

Key Pain Points

Australian MSPs face a distinct set of pressures when it comes to SAP Solution Architect capability — and most of them trace back to the same root problem: the architecture function is either too expensive to carry permanently or too thin to win the work that needs it.

i. No credible architecture capability means no competitive bid. Australian enterprises and government bodies running large SAP programs now routinely require MSPs to demonstrate named, experienced architecture resources at bid stage. An MSP that can only point to senior functional consultants as its highest-tier resource loses complex bids to firms that can put a credible architect in the room. The absence of this capability is a direct commercial constraint.

ii. Reliance on individual contractors creates delivery risk. Most Australian MSPs that do have SAP architecture capability carry it through one or two key individuals — typically long-term contractors or senior employees whose departure would leave the practice exposed. This fragility creates risk on active engagements and limits the MSP's ability to pursue new programs simultaneously.

iii. Architecture work gets absorbed into functional consulting. Without a dedicated architect, the design decisions that should be owned at the architectural level get absorbed by senior functional consultants who are already carrying configuration and client management responsibilities. The result is architecture by committee — inconsistent, undocumented, and difficult to defend when a client's system behaves unexpectedly twelve months post-go-live.

iv. Margin compression on complex programs. The commercial economics of a large SAP program require architecture capability to be embedded in the delivery team, not purchased at $1,200+ per day as an occasional consultant. MSPs that can only access architect-level capability through high-rate contractors struggle to build a margin structure that makes complex programs commercially viable.

v. Limited practice growth. Expanding an SAP practice requires the ability to pitch and deliver progressively more complex engagements. Architecture capability is the ceiling on that growth. MSPs that cannot staff an architect cannot pitch for the programs that would take their practice to the next level. For more on the talent challenges MSPs face across their SAP practices, the guide on overcoming MSP recruiting challenges provides a broader framework.

Why MSPs Should Hire Offshore SAP Solution Architects

The case for offshore SAP architecture hiring is strongest for MSPs because the commercial model of a managed services practice makes local architecture resourcing particularly difficult to justify.

a. The dedicated model solves the contractor dependency problem. A full-time offshore SAP Solution Architect, exclusively dedicated to your MSP, is a practice asset — not a line item on a client invoice. That architect builds knowledge of your delivery methodology, your clients' SAP landscapes, your module strengths, and your standard architecture patterns over time. That continuity is structurally impossible with a contractor model.

b. It unlocks the bids you are currently losing. MSPs that place a named, experienced offshore SAP architect on bid documents — with real project history, verifiable credentials, and a consistent track record of program delivery — win work they are currently excluded from. The capability signal changes the commercial conversation.

c. The cost structure enables viable program economics. At 55–70% of local cost, an offshore SAP Solution Architect can be included in program budgets where an onshore architect simply cannot. This opens program types — mid-market S/4HANA migrations, complex AMS contracts, multi-system integration programs — that were previously priced out of reach for the MSP's cost base.

d. Architecture depth improves delivery quality across all engagements. An offshore architect embedded in the MSP's delivery team — attending design reviews, providing governance on functional specs, reviewing integration designs — raises the quality floor across every engagement that touches SAP. The downstream cost of architecture-level errors (rework, defect cycles, post-go-live issues) is many times the cost of the architecture function itself.

e. It is a long-term practice investment. An experienced SAP Solution Architect who stays with your MSP for three or more years builds an irreplaceable understanding of your clients, your delivery patterns, and the architecture decisions that have worked and failed in your specific market. That institutional knowledge compounds — and it is only possible through a dedicated, long-term offshore engagement.

Key Challenges of Hiring Offshore SAP Solution Architects

Offshore SAP Solution Architect hiring is qualitatively different from hiring offshore ABAP developers or functional consultants. The stakes of a poor hire are higher, the vetting process is more demanding, and the integration into your delivery model requires more deliberate management.

i. Finding genuinely senior talent in a competitive offshore market. The offshore SAP architect market — particularly in India — has a large population of consultants who describe themselves as solution architects but have functional consultant experience at best. True SAP Solution Architects with genuine end-to-end program ownership, demonstrated architecture decision-making, and the gravitas to engage client steering committees are a much smaller pool. The vetting process has to probe deeply and specifically for real architectural experience — not just SAP project involvement.

ii.Verifying end-to-end program ownership. The difference between a functional lead who has been "acting as an architect" and a genuine SAP Solution Architect is program ownership. Did they design the solution, or did they implement someone else's design? Did they make the integration decisions, or did they follow a pattern set by someone upstream? Did they engage the executive sponsor, or did they sit quietly in the room? These distinctions are hard to surface in a standard interview and require structured reference-checking from people who can speak to the architect's actual decision-making role.

iii. Communication and executive stakeholder capability. A SAP Solution Architect who cannot engage Australian enterprise clients at a senior level — presenting architecture decisions, managing scope discussions, and navigating the political dynamics of a complex program — creates a delivery problem regardless of their technical depth. Communication quality and client-facing confidence have to be assessed explicitly, not assumed from technical competency.

iii. Australian enterprise and regulatory context. SAP programs in Australia have specific characteristics — Australian payroll and superannuation, GST and tax configuration, compliance with Australian financial reporting standards, government security requirements, and the operational realities of sectors like mining, utilities, financial services, and retail. An offshore architect without exposure to these contexts needs structured onboarding to Australian norms before they can work effectively on client programs.

iv. Integration into the onshore delivery team. A SAP Solution Architect works most effectively when embedded in the delivery team — on the call when key decisions are being made, with visibility across all workstreams, and with the authority to make and document architectural decisions. Building this integration across time zones requires deliberate process design: structured design authority sessions, clear decision-making protocols, documented design registers, and regular onshore-offshore alignment rituals.

v. Continuity and retention. Experienced SAP architects in offshore markets have options. MSPs that treat offshore architects as interchangeable resources — without career development, meaningful program ownership, and genuine inclusion in the practice — lose them. The investment required to attract a senior offshore architect is wasted if the MSP does not have a retention environment to match.

Building Long-Term Offshore SAP Architecture Capability

The MSPs getting the most commercial value from offshore SAP architecture hiring are treating it as a practice-level investment, not a project resourcing decision. That means different things at different stages of the relationship.

In the first three months, the focus is validation — engaging the architect on a real program, assessing fit against your methodology and client expectations, and refining the integration model before scaling.

From months three to twelve, the investment is in structured onboarding — Australian context, client protocols, design documentation standards, governance processes — and in genuinely including the offshore architect in pitch processes and client relationships, not just delivery.

Beyond twelve months, the value is in compounding. Architecture templates, standard integration patterns, reusable solution design frameworks, and the accumulated knowledge of your specific client base become practice assets that reduce ramp-up costs and raise quality on every subsequent engagement.

For governance frameworks that apply to architect-level roles and help MSPs build a structured offshore engagement model, the guides on why some offshore hires fail and how to hire offshore developers step-by-step provide practical starting points.

How Remote Office Helps MSPs Hire Offshore SAP Solution Architects

Remote Office addresses each of these challenges through a structured sourcing, vetting, and placement model designed specifically for Australian MSPs.

What We Provide

Remote Office sources and places dedicated, full-time offshore SAP Solution Architects for Australian MSPs delivering large-scale ERP programs. Every architect placed through Remote Office works exclusively for your organisation — embedded in your program team, aligned to your delivery governance, and engaged as a long-term practice resource, not a project-by-project contractor.

• Deep specialist sourcing — Remote Office sources from a pre-qualified network of SAP Solution Architects across India, focusing specifically on consultants with verifiable end-to-end program ownership, demonstrated architectural decision-making on large SAP programs, and the communication capability required for Australian enterprise client engagement
• Rigorous architecture-specific vetting — every candidate goes through a multi-stage assessment process that probes architectural thinking specifically: program history and ownership verification, architecture knowledge interview covering system landscape design and integration architecture, a solution design exercise, an executive communication assessment, and reference checks from previous program leads and clients
• Australian context integration — every candidate is assessed for familiarity with Australian SAP environments, regulatory context, and business norms relevant to your MSP's client base; where gaps exist, Remote Office supports structured onboarding to Australian requirements as part of the placement process
• iDedicated model — every architect placed through Remote Office works exclusively for your MSP; they build knowledge of your practice, your clients, and your delivery methodology over time — a structural requirement for architecture capability to compound as a practice asset
• HR, payroll, and compliance fully managed — Remote Office handles all administrative overhead on the offshore side; your MSP manages delivery and retains full governance over architectural direction and client relationships

How It Works

Talent Sourcing. We draw from a pre-qualified network of SAP Solution Architects across India — candidates with verifiable large-program experience, genuine architectural decision-making history, and the breadth of SAP knowledge required to govern a complex multi-module program.

Screening and Vetting. Every candidate goes through a structured architecture-specific assessment covering program history and ownership verification, architecture knowledge interview, architecture document sample review, executive communication assessment, and reference checks from program leads and client stakeholders on previous engagements.

Client Matching. We match candidates to your specific program type, SAP landscape, client context, and delivery model. An MSP pitching S/4HANA migrations for mid-market manufacturers has different requirements to an enterprise running a complex global SAP rollout.

Onboarding. Structured 30-day onboarding including Australian business context alignment, delivery governance integration, and a plan for integrating the architect into your program team and client relationships.

Ongoing Management. HR, payroll, compliance, and performance support handled by Remote Office. Delivery managed by your team.

Business Outcomes

• Programs designed correctly from the start — architecture decisions made deliberately, documented properly, and governed consistently across all workstreams
• Reduced total program cost — 55–70% saving versus onshore architect hires, with compounding value from institutional knowledge built over time
• Competitive bid capability — named, credible architecture resources on bid documents that win complex programs
• Reduced post-go-live rework — architectural governance during delivery prevents the design errors that create expensive stabilisation cycles
• Practice scalability — architecture capability that grows with your SAP practice rather than constraining it
• Reduced dependency on the local contractor market — stop competing at $1,200+ per day for architect-level talent captured by the major consulting firms

If you are planning a large-scale ERP programme and need to scale your architecture capability, Remote Office helps you hire dedicated offshore Solution Architects aligned to Australian delivery standards.

• Reduce costs by up to 70%
• Accelerate programme timelines
• Build a scalable, high-performing architecture team

Speak to Remote Office today →

‍